DISCLAIMER:

These summaries of case decisions are intended for informational purposes only. They are not intended to be interpretations of the law, nor do they encompass the subtleties of each case. Therefore, reference to the original text is indispensable.



Monday, May 7, 2012

Gangi v. Commonwealth



Facts: Gangi, who was serving a sentence for indecent assault and battery on a person over the age of fourteen, was scheduled to be released on September 10, 2010. Multiple delays ensued, including continuances requested by Gangi's counsel. Probable cause was not found until January 7, 2011; at a hearing on that day, a Superior Court judge accepted Gangi's stipulation to the existence of probable cause.

Procedural History: The Commonwealth filed a petition in the Superior Court for the temporary commitment of
Gangi as a sexually dangerous person.  After the probable cause hearing, no petition for trial was filed within 60 days. Gangi moved to dismiss the Commonwealth's petition for his civil commitment as a sexually dangerous person. A Superior Court judge denied Gangi's motion to dismiss. Gangi appealed.

Issue: Whether or not the clerk’s errors in failing to docket the finding of probable cause on time constitute “extraordinary circumstances” excusing defendant’s commitment beyond the sixty day limit.

Holding: The Supreme Judicial Court held that clerk's error in failing contemporaneously to docket the finding of probable cause did not constitute “extraordinary circumstances” excusing defendant's commitment beyond the maximum sixty day period permitted for the temporary commitment of a sex offender for the purpose of examination and diagnosis.

Rulings of Law: The sixty-day deadline is “mandatory to protect a defendant's liberty interest, and any delay by the Commonwealth that results in a confinement exceeding sixty days is a violation of the statute.” Such delays may be excused only where there exist “extraordinary circumstances that would justify a very brief delay. Here, the clerk's error in failing contemporaneously to docket the finding of probable cause does not fall within the category of “extraordinary circumstances.” Absent “extraordinary circumstances,” any violation of the sixty-day statutory deadline, however brief, requires dismissal.

Disposition: The judgment denying relief is vacated, and a judgment entered in the county court granting Gangi's petition for relief. (EC)