DISCLAIMER:

These summaries of case decisions are intended for informational purposes only. They are not intended to be interpretations of the law, nor do they encompass the subtleties of each case. Therefore, reference to the original text is indispensable.



Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Elizabeth de Moll's summary of "Commonwealth v. Jackson"

Commonwealth v. Jackson
464 Mass. 758 (2013)

The defendant was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and in a school zone violation. The trial court denied the defendant's pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. The defendant filed an application for leave to prosecute an interlocutory appeal. The application was granted, and the case was reported to the Appeals Court. After transferring the case on its own initiative from the Appeals Court, the Supreme Judicial Court held that the warrantless search of defendant's backpack was not valid as a search incident to arrest.
The Supreme Judicial Court reviewed the defendant’s claim that the search violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States’ Constitution. One requirement of a lawful search incident to arrest is a basis to arrest the suspect before searching him. The court ruled that the social passing of marijuana does not fall under distribution but is rather considered possession. Thus the officers' observation of the defendant and two others passing a marijuana cigarette back and forth did not provide sufficient probable cause to arrest the defendant. The court concluded that the defendant’s motion to suppress should have been allowed. The order was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Written 7/2013